![]() ![]() There are no remaining WP:WIAGA issues and I have explained most of your quibbles. ![]() decltype ( talk) 10:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply I think most of the complaints are based on a lack of understanding of the importance of the content as presented. Comments from additional reviewers are welcomed. The reader wants to know about what platforms software is available for.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply Īll in all, I think the article is pretty good, but not yet "Good" as in "Good Article".I have revised the All The Aces citation for clarity of its WP:RS status.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply.Is a reliable source? What about ? (Is the sentence this source supports really relevant, anyway?) It is not OR and this is likely to be the DYK hook.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply Sources ![]() Another quibble is the use of "you", addressing the reader directly. This is regarded as a HUD or heads-up display The character is well-remembered for the data streams in his vision. The HUD is best explained by analogy to the Terminator made famous by Arnold Schwarzenegger. It would be like revealing stats for one half of one basketball game or something.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply Text Īs for the prose, I find the article reasonably well written, but this: Keep in mind that these are only the stats after one session of the tournament and that no one has even played with me (ElT007) for 50 hands. While I think it's unlikely that this information could be effectively exploited, I think it's better to err on the side of caution. I am also slightly concerned about publicly displaying the VPIP / PFR / AF of real players. At even 50 or 60% of the original size the text is illegible.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply He has agreed that at much smaller resolution the text is illegible. I have talkesd with the tagger about the legibility of the text in the images. For the reasons outlined above, I think the article currently fails 6a/b of WP:WIAGA. I am unsure what the current consensus is regarding the actual resolution of non-free software screenshots, but I see at least one of the images tagged with. If necessary a cropped image of the HUD could be created, but the reader is learning about online poker by seeing the whole screen.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply The hand history and tournament log show them exactly what the article is describing.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply The HUD screenshot, which is used in several articles, gives the viewer an understanding of the online poker session. The HUD screenshot displays a lot of irrelevant detail (only the table window, and possibly the Instant Hand History actually shows the HUD).įor the average reader (This is probably going to be a DYK tomorrow.) they have no sense of what type of data the program uses. The hand history and tournament log, while not non-free, take up a substantial amount of space in the article without conveying that much useful information to the reader. There are only three non-free images and each teaches the reader what the fuss is about by showing the two currently suppported versions of the software.- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 14:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Reply Even reducing the images to 60% of original size causes a significant loss in legibility. The resolution of the images is necessary to convey the content. Especially the one in the main infobox, where the main window's width could have been reduced without any loss of information. Some of them could be greatly reduced by simply resizing the windows before taking the screenshots. I think the article is excessive in its use of images, especially high-resolution non-free ones. Hi, A few suggestions which the main reviewer and article contributors may choose to heed or ignore. contribs) 17:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Reply 2nd opinion.The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.Īrticle seems good, it needed some NPOVing, which I did myself. This discussion is transcluded from Talk:PokerTracker/GA1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |